How reimbursements of blood expenses affect the voluntary blood donation recruitment: A comparative study / 中国输血杂志

【Objective】 To discuss the influence of direct reimbursement of blood expenses in hospitals on the recruitment of blood donors in Xianyang City. 【Methods】 Blood donors or reimbursers, who reimbursed blood expenses either at hospitals or at our blood center were investigated, and these two kinds of blood expense reimbursements were compared in terms of convenience, the impact on the enthusiasm of blood donation, as well as the impact of the awareness of hospital reimbursement on the recruitment of blood donors. 【Results】 The direct reimbursement of blood expenses at hospitals took 22 minutes per person, without any round trips nor transportation costs. The rate of satisfaction, long-term intention to blood donation, and voluntary mobilization of others were 98.11%, 91.89%, and 82.56%, respectively, higher than those in the reimbursers at blood station(P<0.01). 35.16%, 38.90%, 98.56%, 94.24% and 93.37% of the blood donors, who were aware of benefits of hospital reimbursement, had donated for 2~3 times, donated more than 3 times, satisfied with the way of reimbursement, intended to redonate and mobilize others, which were higher than those who were unaware of the the hospital reimbursement(P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Direct reimbursement of blood expenses at hospitals not only improved the convenience, but also increased the enthusiasm of blood donors by improving their satisfaction, which was conductive to blood donation recruitment.

Therapeutic effect of extralevator abdominoperineal excision in combination with conventional abdominoperineal excision on distal rectal cancer:A Meta-analysis / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

Objective To explore the short and long-term efficacy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE)vs.conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE)on distal rectal cancer.Methods Relevant studies were identified by search of Medline,EMBASE,and Web of Science published between January 1,2008 and February 28,2015,and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis with Stata software (version 12.0). Results Our Meta-analysis included 14 studies involving 3278 patients,of whom 1843 (56.2%)underwent ELAPE and 1435 (43.8%)underwent APE.Compared with patients undergoing APE,those undergoing ELAPE had a significantly reduced risk of intraoperative bowel perforation (IBP)involvement (OR=0 .55 ,95% CI= 0 .37-0 .85 ),but no significant reduction in the occurrence of CRM positivity (OR=0 .81 ,95% CI=0 .52-1 .25 ), local recurrence (LR)(OR=0.49,95% CI=0.18-1.30),wound complications (WCs)(OR=0.93,95% CI=0.65-1.35)or in-hospital death (IHD)(OR=0.89,95% CI=0.47-1.71).Conclusion ELAPE can reduce the risk of IBP but not for CRM positivity or LR when compared with APE.Therefore,more higher-quality studies are needed to verify the short-and long-term effects of ELAPE procedure on distal rectal cancer.

Effect of psychological intervention on the anxious reaction of perioperative patients with esophageal and cardiac carcinoma / 中国医学伦理学

We investigated the psychological condition of 70 inpatients who had esophageal and cardiac carcinoma before radical operation with Hamilton Anxiety Scales.For the patients with anxiety,we carried out psychological intervention before operation which includes general care,follow-up,collective psychotherapy,keep disease condition individually and so on.The results showed the treatment had great benefit to most of the patients.